miércoles, 11 de mayo de 2016

A veces más es menos

Trabado: Código de Barras

Idea Principal...

Nuestra materia se llama Ambiente, desarrollo y sociedad, observando la imagen fuimos invitados a ver cual es la relación entre esta y nuestra materia y luego de reflexionar encontré más de una semejanza.

Esta imagen está ampliamente relacionada con el consumismo, de cómo hoy en día se crean cada vez más aparatos tecnológicos haciendo que el tuyo sea un modelo viejo “obligando” a uno a desechar algo que todavía sirve y a seguir consumiendo. Parecemos esclavos de compra al sentir una necesidad que no es real, es una necesidad creada erróneamente por la sociedad que provoca que nosotros mismos nos encerramos, nos pongamos detrás de las rejas, perjudicandonos, destruyendo todo lo que tenemos dejando a nuestro mundo sin vida y quitándoles a las futuras generaciones la oportunidad de observar las maravillas que el mundo nos ofrece. Produciendo una cantidad de contaminación impensable por solo un capricho humano, obtener el último modelo de celular para así estar a la moda y encajar con la sociedad que se presenta en estos tiempos





La imagen también me llevó a pensar en...

Además esta imagen también me lleva a relacionarla con el supermercado y como destruyen el medio ambiente solo para obtener lo único que pareciera importar en este mundo, plata. Contaminado ríos, mares, suelos y aire solo por industrias, deforestando solo por papel, acelerando y alterando el proceso del cultivo solo por obtenerlo con mayor rapidez y a mayor cantidad entre tantas cosas.


Por último relacionando el código de barras otra vez con el supermercado recordé un proyecto realizado hace 5 años atrás, donde observamos que varios productos a la venta llevaban más de un envoltorio, el cual no era necesario y el cual contamina sin razón.


Responsabilidad es lo que marca la diferencia

E la  materia Ambiente, Desarrollo y Sociedad fuimos invitado a ver un vídeo para darnos cuenta de que necesitamos para hacer consumidores responsable, una vez hecho esto debíamos crear un mapa conceptual a cerca de lo vito en dicho vídeo.
Acá dejo el link de mi trabajo:

http://popplet.com/app/#/3135186

Una frase lo dice todo...





Graciela Catalá (Profesora de Ambiente Desarrollo y Sociedad) nos compartió una serie de vídeos de National Geographic donde mostraba lo que uno consume durante toda su vida (Básicamente habla de la huella ecológica). Luego de mirar este vídeo debíamos elegir, respetando una foto que ella nos dio, una frase de un famoso y luego vincularla con el vídeo visto.



La frase que yo elegí es “Todo parece imposible hasta que se hace”.

El vídeo, como ya mencione, trata acerca del consumismo de cada persona durante toda su vida y muestra que sin darnos cuenta cada uno de nosotros genera una cantidad impensable de basura. Hay un par de frases dichas en el vídeo que me gustaría citar ya que pienso que ayuda a englobar y de alguna manera resumir lo visto en dicho vídeo. Estas citas importantes a resaltar son:

· “Nos hemos enamorado de todo lo que venga primorosamente lavada empaquetado y envuelto.”

· “Envoltorios aumentan velozmente, cada uno de nosotros tira mas envases de comida que productos en sí mismo”

· “Todo lo que llevamos dice algo de quienes somos”(Esto se refiere a la compra compulsiva de ropa)

· “Compraremos casas, construiremos un hogar y ganaremos dinero para gastar en todo lo que la vida nos pueda ofrecer, y aquí es donde la huella comienza a hacerse realmente grande.”

· “Cada uno de nosotros producimos cuarenta toneladas de basura”

· “..... y miles de bienes más de los que aún no se han inventado y que pronto no podremos vivir sin ellos”

Yo creo que la frase que elegí se relaciona con el vídeo ya que uno cree que es imposible revertir la cantidad increíble de basura que se generó durante estos últimos años. Se que mucha gente piensa que con solo su cambio no ayuda, es decir, creen que de todas las personas que existen en el mundo si solo el o ella deja de consumir esto no haría un gran efecto entonces no valdría la pena, todo lo contrario, si cada uno de nosotros toma en consideración lo mal que le hacemos a el medio ambiente y somo lo suficientemente capaz y voluntariosos de reducir aunque sea un poco nuestra huella ecológica, el cambio sería muy grande. Por eso debemos cambiar algunas actitudes y esforzarnos en cuanto esta cuestión para finalmente frenar con todo esto y darnos cuenta que si trabajamos todos juntos nada es imposible hasta que se hace.

domingo, 8 de mayo de 2016

United States coldest case murder conviction



Maria Ridulph Case

The kidnapping and murder of Maria Ridulph was the oldest cold open case to reach the courts in the history of the United States.
Starting point:
On December 3rd 1957, 7 year old, Maria Ridulph was abducted from Sycamore, Illinois. After dinner Maria was playing in the snow with her friend Kathy Sigman when a young man who called himself “Johnny” approached the girlies and offer them a piggyback ride. A few minutes later, Kathy went to her house to fetch her gloves because is was freezing outside but when she came back Johnny and Maria were nowhere to be seen.

Looking for Maria:

Kathy went to the Ridulph’s house to tell everybody what had happened. Chuck, Maria’s older brother went outside to look for the girly but there was not any signal. Rapidly, the men ran to the house of Ralph and Eileen Tessier (two blocks from the Ridulph). Ralph had a hardware store and the idea was to carry on with the search asking the owner to collaborate with flashlights.

Police investigation:

The following days, the police questioned Eileen Tessier about the events of December 3. John stepsisters heard how his mother told the police something they knew it was not true: that John had been home all night.
In addition, there were conflicting reports about the exact time of the disappearance of Maria. The Sycamore police chief told FBI agents that Kathy and Maria had gone out to play at 18:02, but the county sheriff said Maria had not called Kathy until 18:30. Maria's mother later changed his statement and said the girls could have gone outside even at 17:50.
Kathy Sigman spent hours watching carefully the pictures of people on file by the police, but could not find Johnny.
The local police was sure no one in Sycamore could have done such a thing. It had to be an action done by a trucker or someone passing by. The FBI was not so sure. There were several potential suspects in the village. Police questioned all "known sexual deviants". They investigated a voyeur and followed clues that led up to two men nicknamed "Commando" and "Mr. X”.

Maria’s body is found:

Five months later Maria's body appeared, 190 kilometers from her home. A man found his skeleton under a fallen tree on a farm. The cause of death couldn’t be determined.

John Tessier/ Jack Mccullough

The FBI initially showed interest in Tessier as a suspect, a boy from the neighbourhood nicknamed “Commando”. Three days after Maria disappeared, an anonymous woman warned that a young man named "Teschner" who lived in the neighborhood matched with the description of the suspect. A pair of FBI agents showed up at the Tessier house.
Tessier told them then, and continues stating today, he was in Rockford, Illinois, about 65 kilometers northwest of Sycamore, when they kidnapped Maria. His parents supported his story, and was verified by an irrefutable fact: someone who gave his name made a call from Rockford to the Tessier’s house at 18:57, on 3 December 1957.
There was much discussion about the time of the disappearance of Maria. If the kidnap was done around 19:00, then Tessier had an armored alibi. But if they did around 18:15, then something not locked. John could have gone to Rockford Sycamore car and having arrived at 19:00 before disposing Maria’s body.
No one disputes that John traveled to Chicago for a physical test at the military recruiting center. Tessier said he was walking around Chicago the afternoon of December 3, stood in a cabaret show and then went to Rockford to leave the papers in the recruitment center. Recruiters confirm that they saw by the office between 19:15 and 19:30 that afternoon.
Two days after the FBI interrogated Tessier, he was subjected to the lie detector test. When asked if he had ever had sex with children, Tessier admitted having been involved in "some kind of sex play" with a girl but had occurred several years before. He stated that the episode was over and had no relationship with Maria.
Those details did not raise suspicions at the time. Nor the contradictory versions of his mother when she told the police that his son was home all night and the FBI that was in Rockford that night. Finally, an FBI agent concluded his report by emphasizing: "There will not be other research related to this suspect”
New Investigation:

In January 1994, Eileen Tessier was on the verge of death but she had a secret she didn't want to take to the grave. "Janet!" She called her daughter, according to the statement made to the court itself many years later. Janet ran to her mother's bed. Eileen grabbed her wrist and spoke.
“That girl who disappeared. It was John. You have to tell someone.” Although Janet was a baby when her neighbor of seven years disappeared in 1957, she knew immediately what her mother was confessing, her brother, John kidnapped and killed Maria Ridulph.
It was a decade later when Janet Tessier tried one last time after several denies to tell her testimony. She sent an email to the Police of Illinois: "A seven year old girl named Maria Ridulph disappeared. Her remains were found in early spring of 1958. I think John Tessier, of Sycamore, is responsible for her death. Today he lives around Seattle under the name of Jack McCullough. "
Her urge caught the attention of a boss. He called Janet and she told him how her mother had told her on the deathbed that his brother had kidnapped and killed Maria. "I can not promise anything," said the police chief, "but we will try."
He assigned the case to two men, Larry Kot and Brion Hanley. Kot, 57, was a civilian analyst and worked for the police in Illinois. “I had never heard of the case Ridulph”, but soon he gathered information that cast doubt on the suspect's alibi.
Brian Hanley, 41, made the preliminary work and began by Janet Tessier and her brothers. None had nothing good to say about John, especially Jeanne who was sexually abused at the age of 14 by John.

Crime Chronology:
Tessier said he was in Chicago on Tuesday morning December 3, getting a medical checkup. Kot found that it was true. But he realised that Tessier left the recruitment center at noon. He was later seen in Rockford, almost 150 kilometers from Chicago, about 19:15. But there was no witness to verify his whereabouts between noon and 19:15, which meant he could have easily gone back to Sycamore before appearing in Rockford. Kot examined the account of another witness, the dealer of heating oil. The man knew Kathy Sigman and her family and remembered that the girl had greeted him when he was delivering fuel into a nearby house. He arrived there at 18hrs and was 15 to 20 minutes unloading the oil. When he left, about 18:20, he did not see the girls.
Kot concluded that Maria had been kidnapped before 18:20. If Tessier parked his car in the back entrance, where they found the doll Maria, Rockford could have been addressed directly with the girl in her car. It was a journey of 64 kilometers, and could have come to Rockford in less than an hour.
The call made from Rockford to the house of Tessier, was a key part of John alibi also fit into this new timeline. Phone records showed that the call was made at 18:57 but did not point from which place of Rockford had been realized. Tessier could have called home from a pay phone outside the village.It may be that Tessier's alibi was not as infallible after all.

Arrest:

Hanley took six photos and placed them on the table. Five of them had been removed from Sycamore school yearbook. The photo of John Tessier was a little different. Kathy eliminated several pictures immediately but looked at two: No. 1 and No. 4. He studied for two long minutes. "He is," she finally said, noting the number 4. I had no doubt. Now the detectives had a real suspect. It was time to visit to "Johnny".
Seattle two policemen who had joined the case learned that the "person in question" worked in a block of apartments for elderly people. He called himself Jack McCullough because he had changed the name in the early 90's when he married his fourth wife, Sue, for nearly two decades.
He was a former policeman. The agents examined his file and discovered a lurid past. They learned that he had been dismissed from the police after being accused of abusing a child under 15 years who had run away from home. They also found out about the photo of her 11 year old daughter naked hidden in the bottom of a drawer. Police arrest McCullough on June 29, 2011. Jack McCullough returned to Sycamore handcuffed on July 27, 2011, the same day authorities exhumed the body of Maria Ridulph.
McCullough would face trial for rape before facing trial for the murder of Maria.
Judge Robbin Stuckert raised many doubts after people tell their testimonies which were related to John’s dirty and obscure attitudes. He wondered why the applicant had waited decades to publicize the crime. But the verbal war between Stuckert and Campbell led the judge to withdraw from the murder trial. The case was referred to Judge James C. Hallock.
During the trial, in September 2012, the statement Kathy Sigman on stage was decisive when retold how a stranger who called himself Johnny offered them a piggyback ride, and how Maria and Johnny disappeared when she went home to find her mittens.
Kathy stood firm when she was shown the six pictures of the suspects she had already seen in 2010. Janet Tessier testified about the statement of her mother on her deathbed.
Then three prison informers confirmed that in a conversation with McCullough, he had admitted that he had killed Maria. The trial lasted four days. No McCullough took the stand, so he could not present his alibi. The judge issued the verdict. Guilty on all counts: murder, kidnapping and abduction of a child. And Johnny went to prison.





Jack McCullough, 76, was serving a life sentence for the 1957 murder of 7-year-old Maria Ridulph. Judge William Brady threw out the conviction after a prosecutor found "clear and convincing evidence" that McCullough was wrongly found guilty.
McCullough's lawyers and DeKalb County state's attorney Richard Schmack argued that McCullough's conviction was based on false testimony, improper legal rulings controlling the evidence presented, and a timeline that was tweaked some 50 years after the fact to rule out McCullough's alibi.
McCullough has long insisted that he couldn't possibly have abducted and killed the child because he was 40 miles away in Rockford, Illinois, talking to recruiters and trying to enlist in the U.S. Air Force when she was taken. The prisoner was set free on 2016.

domingo, 1 de mayo de 2016

Expers



Expert means a person who has a broad knowledge in a specific field, because of their experience and skills they are seen as a credible source. Anyway because they are experts does not mean that they don't make mistakes, they still are human beings and all human beings make mistakes hence we can say that experts are not always right.

I don't agree with what illich argues in Item A, in my opinion what he say is wrong because i consider that housing hygiene, diet are some of the main factors affecting the health population, on the other hand, I think that changing this will not solve the complete problem, maybe it will avoid some illnesses anyway medical establishment is essential for our life. We can't treat society as a whole, sometimes we have to focus in an individual person. This “kind of mistake” could be associated with changing expertise”

In item C “expert” treat a topic of africans slavery, they say that the wiah they have of being free is a desses, when in fact they have the right of doing whatever they like instead of being obeying orders from someone.

In item D happens the same as in C but instead of the black race they talk about gays and take this as a mental dresses, while in fact what they're doing is discriminating.

In conclusion, none of the three cases is right, being an expert and knowing about the topic doesn't mean that you cannot be wrong.